Corrections Policy

Last updated: September 2026

We correct genuine errors quickly and say so. This page explains what counts as a correction, how to report one and what happens next.

Reporting an error

Email info@rupeeveda.site with the page URL and a description of the problem. For calculator issues, include the exact inputs you used (or the share link generated by the "Share" button, which encodes them) and the result you expected, so we can reproduce it. Reports are acknowledged and investigated in the order received.

What we treat as a correction

  • Calculation errors — a formula or implementation that produces a wrong result for valid inputs. These are the highest priority.
  • Factual errors — a misstatement of how a product, rule or concept works.
  • Misleading wording — text that, while technically accurate, could reasonably be read as advice, a guarantee or a recommendation.
  • Broken links or navigation that send readers to the wrong or a missing page.

How we handle corrections

  1. We reproduce the issue and check it against our sources or formulas.
  2. Calculation errors are fixed in code, a regression test is added so the same mistake cannot recur, and the automated suite is re-run.
  3. Text corrections are made on the page and its "last updated" date is refreshed.
  4. Where a correction materially changes the meaning of a guide or a calculator's results, we add a short note on the page describing what changed.
  5. Typos and formatting fixes that do not change meaning are made without a note.

Rate and rule changes are not errors — but we still update

When the government or a regulator changes a rate or rule, our previously published default becomes out of date. We treat refreshing it as scheduled maintenance rather than a correction, update the configuration and the "last verified" date, and note the change on the affected calculator page.

If you disagree with our decision

If we conclude the content is correct but you still believe it is wrong, reply with your source and we will look again. Where reasonable people can differ on interpretation, we will add clarifying context rather than leave the page ambiguous.